شیمى کاربردى روز

شیمى کاربردى روز

مقایسه طرح‌آزمایش های باکس-بنکن، مرکب مرکزی و دی-اپتیمال در بهینه سازی حذف رنگ فتالوسیانین با نانو ذرات مغناطیسی اکسید آهن اصلاح شده با پلی‌آسپارتیک اسید

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان
گروه شیمی، دانشکده علوم پایه، دانشگاه اراک، اراک، ایران
چکیده
در این مطالعه، عملکرد طرح‌ آزمایش های باکس-بنکن، مرکب مرکزی و دی-اپتیمال (به ترتیب BBD، CCD یا DOD) برای استفاده در مدل‌سازی و بهینه‌ سازی حذف رنگ فتالوسیانین با استفاده از نانو ذرات مغناطیسی اکسید آهن اصلاح‌ شده با پلی آسپارتیک اسید (Fe3O4@-PAs) مقایسه شد. به عنوان یک مطالعه موردی، درصد حذف رنگ فتالوسیانین با تمام این رویکردهای طراحی آزمایش مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفته است. مزایا و محدودیت های این تکنیک های مختلف سطح پاسخ به طور تجربی در نظر گرفته شده است. هر سه طرح در مدل‌سازی آماری و بهینه ‌سازی عوامل تأثیرگذار بر فرآیند (یعنی غلظت اولیه رنگ فتالوسیانین (C) ، مقدار مصرفی جاذب (m)، و pH) کارآمد بودند، اما طرح مرکب مرکزی به دلیل توانایی پیش‌بینی نزدیک‌تر به داده‌های تجربی، سازگارترین طرح بود. بر اساس نتایج CCD، شرایط بهینه برای متغیرهای C، m و pH به ترتیب 40 میلی‌گرم بر لیتر، 9 میلی‌گرم و 3/3 است که به 99 درصد حذف منجر می‌شود. علاوه بر این مطالعات، واجذبی رنگ و استفاده مجدد از جاذب از بخش‌های تکمیلی این تحقیق هستند. لازم به ذکر است که طیف بینی‌‌های تبدیل فوریه مادون قرمز (FT-IR) و پراش اشعه ایکس (XRD) و تصویر برداری SEM برای بررسی جاذب (Fe3O4@-PAs) استفاده شد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Comparison of Box–Behnken, Central Composite, and D-Optimal Designs for Optimization of Phthalocyanine Dye Removal Using Magnetic Nanoparticles Iron Oxide Modified by Polyaspartic Acid

نویسندگان English

Javad Zolgharnein
Shahab Feshki
Saeideh Dermanaki Farahani
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Arak University, Arak, Islamic Republic of Iran
چکیده English

In this study, the performance of the Box–Behnken, central composite and D-optimal designs (BBD, CCD or DOD, respectively) were compared for the use in modeling and optimizing the new study of the removal of phthalocyanine dye using magnetic nanoparticles iron oxide modified by ployaspartic acid (Fe3O4-PAs). As a case study, removal percent (%R) of phthalocyanine dye has been evaluated with all these experimental design approaches. The advantages and limitations of these different response surface techniques have been experimentally considered. All three designs were efficient in the statistical modeling and optimization of the influential process factors such as initial concentration of phthalocyanine dye (C), and adsorbent dosage (m), pH but the central composite design was the most consistent design due to the prediction closer to the experimental data. Based on the results of CCD, the optimized conditions for C, m, and pH variables are 40 mg/L, 9 mg, and 3.3 respectively that lead to %R = 99. In addition to these studies, the investigations of the dye desorption and the adsorbent reusability are complementary divisions of this research.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Box-Behnken design
Central composite design
D-optimal design
Nanoparticles
Magnetic nanoparticles
Phthalocyanine
[1] Crini, G. (2006). Non-conventional low-cost adsorbents for dye removal: a review. Bioresource technology, 97(9), 1061-1085.
[2] Forgacs, E., Cserháti, T., & Oros, G. (2004). Removal of synthetic dyes from wastewaters: a review. Environment international, 30(7), 953-971.
[3] Beeley, P. (2001). Foundry technology. Elsevier.
[4] Gupta, V. K. (2009). Application of low-cost adsorbents for dye removal–a review. Journal of environmental management, 90(8), 2313-2342.
[5] Xu, X. R., Li, H. B., Wang, W. H., & Gu, J. D. (2004). Degradation of dyes in aqueous solutions by the Fenton process. Chemosphere, 57(7), 595-600.
[6] Moser, F. H., & Thomas, A. L. (1964). Phthalocyanine compounds. Journal of Chemical Education, 41(5), 245.
[7] Monahan, A. R., Brado, J. A., & DeLuca, A. F. (1972). Dimerization of a copper (II)-phthalocyanine dye in carbon tetrachloride and benzene. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 76(3), 446-449.
[8] Chen, F., Deng, Z., Li, X., Zhang, J., & Zhao, J. (2005). Visible light detoxification by 2, 9, 16, 23-tetracarboxyl phthalocyanine copper modified amorphous titania. Chemical physics letters, 415(1-3), 85-88.
[9] Juang, R. S., & Shiau, R. C. (2000). Metal removal from aqueous solutions using chitosan-enhanced membrane filtration. Journal of membrane science, 165(2), 159-167.
[10] Fiksdal, L., & Leiknes, T. (2006). The effect of coagulation with MF/UF membrane filtration for the removal of virus in drinking water. Journal of Membrane Science, 279(1-2), 364-371.
[11] Khajeh, M., Laurent, S., & Dastafkan, K. (2013). Nanoadsorbents: classification, preparation, and applications (with emphasis on aqueous media). Chemical reviews, 113(10), 7728-7768.
[12] Hibbert, D. B. (2012). Experimental design in chromatography: a tutorial review. Journal of chromatography B, 910, 2-13.
[13] Antony, J. (2023). Design of experiments for engineers and scientists. Elsevier.
[14] Zolgharnein, J., Shahmoradi, A., & Ghasemi, J. B. (2013). Comparative study of Box–Behnken, central composite, and Doehlert matrix for multivariate optimization of Pb(II) adsorption onto Robinia tree leaves. Journal of Chemometrics, 27(1-2), 12-20.
[15] “Minitab 17 statistical software help or https://support.minitab.com/en-us/minitab/18/.”.
[16] Leardi, R. (2009). Experimental design in chemistry: A tutorial. Analytica chimica acta, 652(1-2), 161-172.
[17] Massart, D. L., Vandeginste, B. G., Buydens, L. M., Lewi, P. J., Smeyers-Verbeke, J., & Jong, S. D. (1998). Handbook of chemometrics and qualimetrics. Elsevier Science Inc.
[18] Atkinson, A. C., & Tobias, R. D. (2008). Optimal experimental design in chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A, 1177(1), 1-11.
[19] Herrero, A., Ortiz, M. C., & Sarabia, L. A. (2013). D-optimal experimental design coupled with parallel factor analysis 2 decomposition a useful tool in the determination of triazines in oranges by programmed temperature vaporization–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry when using dispersive-solid phase extraction. Journal of Chromatography A, 1288, 111-126.
[20] Cortada, C., Vidal, L., & Canals, A. (2011). Determination of nitroaromatic explosives in water samples by direct ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction followed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Talanta, 85(5), 2546-2552.
[21] Phantu, S., & Suttiarporn, P. (2025). CMMSE: a comparison of model fitting using different response surface designs for optimizing microwave-assisted simultaneous distillation and extraction in Khlu herbal tea essential oil production. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 63(2), 578-595. ‏
[22] Zolgharnein, J., Dermanaki Farahani, S., Bagtash, M., & Amani, S. (2020). Application of a new metal-organic framework of [Ni2F2(4,4′-bipy)2(H2O)2](VO3)2.8H2O as an efficient adsorbent for removal of Congo red dye using experimental design optimization. Environmental research, 182, 109054.
[23] Dermanaki Farahani, S., & Zolgharnein, J. (2021). Multivariate optimization of high removal of lead (II) using an efficient synthesized Ni-based metal–organic framework adsorbent. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 29, 146-153.
[24] Ngan, C. L., Basri, M., Lye, F. F., Masoumi, H. R. F., Tripathy, M., Karjiban, R. A., & Abdul-Malek, E. (2014). Comparison of Box–Behnken and central composite designs in optimization of fullerene loaded palm-based nano-emulsions for cosmeceutical application. Industrial Crops and Products, 59, 309-317.‏
[25] Boateng, I. D., & Yang, X. M. (2021). Process optimization of intermediate-wave infrared drying: Screening by Plackett–Burman; comparison of Box-Behnken and central composite design and evaluation: A case study. Industrial Crops and Products, 162, 113287. ‏
[26] Tamandani, M., & Hashemi, S. H. (2022). Central composite design (CCD) and Box-Behnken design (BBD) for the optimization of a molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) based pipette tip micro-solid phase extraction (SPE) for the spectrophotometric determination of chlorpyrifos in food and juice. Analytical Letters, 55(15), 2394-2408. ‏
[27] Karamchandani, B. M., Maurya, P. A., Pawar, A. A., Pable, A., Awale, M., Dalvi, S. G., ... & Satpute, S. K. (2025). The role of statistical methods in optimizing and enhancing fungal chitosan commercial production. 3 Biotech, 15(3), 1-23. ‏
[28] Liu, Y., & Liu, Y. J. (2008). Biosorption isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics. Separation and purification technology, 61(3), 229-242.
[29] Yang P., Chen.W., Wang Ch. (2011). Preparation and in vitro cytotoxicity study of poly (aspartic acid) stabilized magnetic nanoparticles, Chem. China., 6(1), 9-14.
[30] Zolgharnein, J., Feshki, Sh., & Dermanaki Farahani, S. (2024). Spectrophotometric Determination and D-Optimal Design Optimization for Pre-Concentration and Separation of the Mixture of Acenaphthene and Pyrene Using Nano-Cobalt Ferrite Oxide Modified by Aspartic Aacid. Nashrieh Shimi va Mohandesi Shimi Iran, 42(4), 135-153. (in persion)
[31] Pavia D. L., Lampman G., Kriz G. (1996). Introduction to spectroscopy: a guide for student of organic chemistry. 2nd Edition, Saundes golden sunburst series. Orlando.
[32] Zolgharnein, J., Choghaei, Z., Bagtash, M., Feshki, Sh., Rastgordani, M., & Zolgharnein, P. (2016). Nano-Fe3O4 and corn cover composite for removal of Alizarin Red S from aqueous solution: characterization and optimization investigations. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(57), 27672-27685.
[33] Bagtash, M., Yamini, Y., Tahmasebi, E., Zolgharnein, J., & Dalirnasab, Z. (2016). Magnetite nanoparticles coated with tannic acid as a viable sorbent for solid-phase extraction of Cd2+, Co2+ and Cr3+. Microchimica Acta, 183, 449-456.
[34] Ghahraman Afshar, M., Rajabi, M., Payehghadr, M. and Bahrami Panah, N. (2024). Fe3O4@SiO2 Magnetic Core-Shell Nanoparticles Functionalized with 1,4-dihydroxyanthraquinone as an Effective and Recyclable Adsorbent for Removal of Copper Ion from Aqueous Solutions. Applied Chemistry Today, 19(73), 115-130.
[35] Fekri, M. H. , Saki, F. , Razavi-Mehr, M. and Soleymani, S. (2023). Preparation of SBA-16 silicate nanoabsorbent by green method from reed plant stem, using it to remove Phenolphthalein pollutant and investigating effective factors by RSM method. Applied Chemistry Today, 18(68), 271-288. (in persion)
[36] Nikseresht, A. and Normohamadi, H. (2024). Development and Optimization Synthesis of MIL-101(Cr) by Ultrasound Irradiation Using Response Surface Methodology. Applied Chemistry Today, 19(71), 223-246. (in persion)
[37] Zolgharnein, J., Bagtash, M., & Shariatmanesh, T. (2015). Simultaneous removal of binary mixture of Brilliant Green and Crystal Violet using derivative spectrophotometric determination, multivariate optimization and adsorption characterization of dyes on surfactant modified nano-γ-alumina. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 137, 1016-1028.
[38] Banerjee, S. S., & Chen, D. H. (2007). Fast removal of copper ions by gum arabic modified magnetic nano-adsorbent. Journal of hazardous materials, 147(3), 792-799.
[39] Parham, H., Zargar, B., Heidari, Z., & Hatamie, A. (2011). Magnetic solid-phase extraction of Rose Bengal using iron oxide nanoparticles modified with cetyltrimethylammonium bromide. Journal of the Iranian Chemical Society, 8, S9-S16.